Quick.Bot vs Botmaker for WhatsApp
At the same $149 a month, Quick.Bot Scale includes 10,000 conversations to Botmaker Standard’s 3,000, and charges $0.007 per extra conversation against $0.07. Prices verified September 2026.
Botmaker is the closest competitor to Quick.Bot on positioning: prices published in dollars, support in Spanish and Portuguese, and billing counted in conversations rather than contacts or agents. So "we understand Latin America" settles nothing here. What separates the two is narrower and easier to check: how many conversations the same $149 a month buys, what each conversation past the quota costs, and whether a customer can pay without leaving the chat.
At a glance
| Botmaker | Quick.Bot | |
|---|---|---|
| Billed for | Conversations per month | Conversations per month |
| What $149/month buys | 3,000 conversations (Standard) | 10,000 conversations (Scale) |
| Each conversation past the quota | $0.07 | $0.007 |
| Agent seats on that plan | 10 included | 10 included |
| Entry paid plan | Standard, $149/month | Starter, $49/month, 1,000 conversations, 1 seat |
| In-chat payments | No in-flow payment option published | Native block, Stripe and Mercado Pago |
| Free option | 300 free starter conversations | Free tier, 100 chats/month; 14-day trial of the paid features |
The same $149, counted two ways
Botmaker’s Standard plan is $149 a month for 3,000 conversations with 10 agent seats included. Quick.Bot’s Scale plan is $149 a month for 10,000 conversations, also with 10 seats. Same monthly price, same number of people who can answer, 3.3 times the conversations.
The second number matters more once you go over. Botmaker charges $0.07 per conversation past the quota; Quick.Bot charges $0.007, ten times less. Run 10,000 conversations in a month on each: on Quick.Bot Scale that is the $149 you already pay, and on Botmaker Standard it is the 3,000 included plus 7,000 extra at $0.07, which is $490 on top, or $639 in total. That gap is the page. Everything else between these two products is a matter of taste.
Below 3,000 conversations the arithmetic flips back, and we say where further down. Check the plan rows yourself on the Quick.Bot pricing page before you commit to either.
Taking payment inside the conversation
Quick.Bot has a native payment block in the flow, charging through Stripe and Mercado Pago, so a customer in Argentina, Mexico or Colombia pays with the method they already use instead of being sent to a checkout in another tab. Botmaker does not publish an in-flow payment option. That is a statement about its public pricing and product pages, not a claim that no such thing exists anywhere in the product: if payments inside the chat are what you are buying, ask them directly and get the answer in writing before you sign.
Meta’s bill sits on top of both
Neither price includes what Meta charges per delivered message, which arrives as a separate bill whichever platform you pick. From 1 October 2026 Meta also charges for service messages, with 1,000 free service messages per month per number. The template and window pricing breakdown covers that half of the invoice.
Where Botmaker is the better choice
If your team is larger than your volume, Botmaker wins on price. Its 10 agent seats start at the Standard plan, while Quick.Bot’s $49 Starter includes one seat and each extra seat is $15 a month. Ten people answering on Starter is $49 plus nine seats at $15, so $184 a month for 1,000 conversations, against Botmaker’s $149 for 3,000. Even on Grow, at $99 with three seats and $12 for each one after that, ten people come to $183 for 3,000 conversations. You only pull ahead once the volume is there.
Botmaker also presents itself as a WhatsApp Business Solution Provider for Meta, and publishes 300 free starter conversations to test with. If you want a vendor with BSP standing and a full support team seated from day one, that is their ground, not ours.
Frequently asked questions
Is Quick.Bot cheaper than Botmaker?
At the same $149 a month, Quick.Bot Scale includes 10,000 conversations against Botmaker Standard’s 3,000, and charges $0.007 per extra conversation against $0.07. Running 10,000 conversations costs $149 on Scale and $639 on Standard. Under 3,000 conversations with a large team, Botmaker can be cheaper, because its 10 seats are included while Quick.Bot’s Starter adds $15 per extra seat. Meta’s per-message bill is separate in both cases.
Does Botmaker support payments inside the chat?
Botmaker does not publish an in-flow payment option on its public pages, which is not the same as saying it has none, so ask them directly if that is decisive for you. Quick.Bot ships a native payment block that charges through Stripe and Mercado Pago from inside the flow.
Can I move my Botmaker flows to Quick.Bot?
Not automatically: the two do not share a flow format, so flows are rebuilt rather than imported. The real work is rebuilding the flows, reconnecting your number through Meta’s embedded signup and repointing the webhook.
Try Quick.Bot free, or read the wider comparison of WhatsApp chatbot platforms.